The interview aims to facilitate the appreciation and recognition of a humanitarian and civil organization in Iraqi Kurdistan, which is known as “BAN” in Kurdish language, which means the “Kurdish Peace Project”. I am honorer to have the opportunity to conduct a series of interviews and write a series of articles in Arabic and English for “BAN” organisation.
This peace movement will leave a mind opening mark on opening up the Kurdistan society. I wish them success and I wish them prosperity in their mission.
By: Dilman Ahmed.
Despite our nationalities and backgrounds, but “Scott Lucas” is my friend.
As one of his readers, I was not only conscious of his academic efforts academically but also aware of his respect for the personal beliefs of others and for basic humanity. He is one of the most honest and decent academic journalists I have known.
I was a postgraduate student of him in one stage of my life, and I became his friend. We talked, we exchanged opinions, we argued, and we listened to each other. All of this was based on a shared pursuit of facts in our commentary and in beliefs which revolve around humanity, mutual care of knowledge, culture, traditions and freedoms — individual, social, religious, and international — and peace.
Scott has been a journalist from the age of 16, starting at a newspaper in Alabama in the southern United States. He became an academic after receiving his Ph.D. at the London School of Economics, and he has been working at the University of Birmingham since 1989. His primary scholarship has been on historical and contemporary American and British foreign policy, including in the Middle East. He has published 11 books and more than 80 articles.
He returned to journalism shortly after the 2003 Iraq war, and created EA WorldView in November 2008. Initially, the site focused on American foreign policy, but Scott realised, after events such as the evolving situation in Iraq, the Israel-Palestinian conflict, the 2009 uprising in Iran, and the “Arab Spring”, that learning and understanding had to start with the situation “on the ground”.
This has resulted in his focus, both in his academic work and his journalism, to learn from people in their societies. It includes learning from Kurdish societies about their aspirations, interests, and movements for effective and responsible governance.
This has strengthened his faith, even in the midst of conflict and man-made disaster, in the possibilities of our political and social action based on rights, respect, and tolerance.
This brief interview with Scott sheds some spotlight on his ideas, his vision of current events, and his hope for understanding and peace between peoples, nations, and religions. Finally, I know him for his humanity.
Q: Professor Lucas, what is your interest in peace movements and civil society?
A. I have been fortunate not only to work as an academic, studying political movements, but also as a journalist and an activist. So I am a student of the past and the present, hoping for some clues about a better future.
Q: And what is the future for humanitarian organizations and movements for civil society?
A: These are difficult days. There are autocratic governments, not only shutting down dissent but willing to suppress movements with violences. The international community is near paralysis in responding, because of the obstruction of influential powers.
But there are good people who persist each day in providing aid and in maintaining the call for rights and respect. In the darkest of times, they give me hope for a dawn.
Q: Is there any hope for advance in the Middle East?
A: In a broad sense, it is hard to find that hope. The Syrian conflict, in which the Assad regime has killed hundreds of thousands of people and displaced millions, has been a crucible for murder in the cause of suppressing rights. In other countries, governments continue to show more appetite for corruption and discrimination than for the development of a just society in which all can participate fully.
But at the grassroots, men and women persist in their rallies and their pursuit of justice and reform. We have seen that in even the most repressive countries in the Middle East.
The hope of 2011 was brief but nine years is a short time in the path of history. We are far from the endpoint of that path.
Q: What is your assessment of the relationship between peace movements, civil society, and the Kurdistan Regional Government?
A: In any nation, not just Iraqi Kurdistan, the challenge is for a stable space in which a Government rules because of legitimacy and a respect for the rights of all.
This does not mean a 100% acceptance or 100% rejection of a Government. It means a legal and secure space for negotiation, in which “democracy” is more than a slogan and rights are not expendable.
Q: Is there a special position for Iraqi Kurdish movements, given the place of Kurdistan in the region?
A: Absolutely. The world’s attention has been drawn in the past to Kurdistan because of the 1991 and 2003 wars in Iraq. But Kurdistan is not a pawn within Iran: it can provide an example for a developing nation, in its internal progress, in its relationship with Baghdad, and in its relationship with other nations in the region.
Often we see the connection across the Middle East as one of violence and the baseline economics of “oil”. Kurdistan is a space for connection across the Middle East over governance, accountability, and rights.
Q: How can Iraqi Kurds benefit from peace movements, civil society groups, and humanitarian organizations in the three other Kurdish nations of Iran, Syria, and Turkey?
A: Rights and justice do not stop at borders. Nor do issues of how to find a non-violent forward with Governments and authorities. Each of the four countries has a particular, recent history from which lessons can be taken. It is precisely because of the blood lost for those lessons that I hope all, including in Iraqi Kurdistan, can find a better way forward.
Q: What are the common values link Iraqi Kurdistan with Western countries?
A: Being decent to one another. No country is an angel. No country is exceptional. Instead, what should connect us is not a quest for dominance but a quest for respect and progress for all.